Skip to content

Neglecting future sporadic volcanic eruptions underestimates climate uncertainty

Man Mei Chim1, Thomas Aubry2, Chris Smith3,4, Anja Schmidt1,5,6

  • Affiliations: 1 Centre for Atmospheric Science, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom 2 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom 3 School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom 4 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria. 5 German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany 6 Meteorological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany

  • Presentation type: Poster

  • Presentation time: Monday 16:30 - 18:30, Room Poster Hall

  • Poster Board Number: 1

  • Programme No: 6.1.7

  • Theme 6 > Session 1


Abstract

Most climate projections represent volcanic eruptions as a constant forcing based on historical averages. This constant forcing approach ignores the sporadic nature of eruptions, preventing a full quantification of uncertainties in climate projections. Here we show that the contribution of volcanic forcing uncertainty to the overall uncertainty in global mean surface temperature projections reaches up to 49%, and is comparable or greater than that from internal variability throughout the 21st century. Furthermore, compared to a constant volcanic forcing, employing a stochastic volcanic forcing (i) reduces the probability of exceeding 1.5 ÂșC warming above pre-industrial level by at least 5% for high climate mitigation scenario (SSP1-1.9) in this century; (ii) enhances the probability of negative decadal temperature trends by up to 8%; and (iii) increases the likelihood of short-term surface cooling and warming events. Intermediate to higher climate mitigation scenarios are particularly sensitive to the choice of volcanic forcing implementation in climate projections. Using a stochastic volcanic forcing approach also enables assessment of the associated climate risks and socio-economic impacts. We recommend improved volcanic forcing approaches for future climate model experiments.